Asus X502CA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus X502CA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X502CA
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130609
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 19 '22 at 19:42
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3337U 33,616 User benchmarks, average bench 47% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 70.1 2-Core 118 60% 93.3 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 168 23% 169 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 117D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.04% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 2.8 3% 3.5 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.04% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD1200BEVS-60UST0 120GB 3,683 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 43 42 35 34 41 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 50.7 Write 50.2 Mixed 31 SusWrite 39.1 32% 42.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 29%
Multiple Card Reader 16GB 2,333 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 3GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9.7 8.1 6.4 9.3 9.3 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 9 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 8.7 16% 14.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.8 122% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 20%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB 672 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 10GB free, PID 0749 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 84 Write 10.7 Mixed 19 SusWrite 10.9 30% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.7 123% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 9 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X502CA Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X502CA

CPU
Celeron 1007UIntelBench 39%, 5,995 samples	32x
Pentium 2117UIntelBench 43%, 5,157 samples	20x
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	16x

GPU
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	52x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	24x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	2x

RAM
8KTF5126 4HZ-1G6D1 1x4GBMicronBench 27%, 529 samples	50x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 26%, 5,316 samples	32x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16