Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive411% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory54.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '22 at 16:03
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 85.3
1-Core 178
2-Core 322
105% 195 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 981
98% 799 Pts
64-Core 1,216
75% 1,216 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8816) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 123
Parallax 130
112% 130 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 105
Splatting 90.8
90% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO 2TB
991GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3099 3998 4354 1476 1716 1320 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
411% Outstanding
Read 2,205
Write 4,171
Mixed 2,540
SusWrite 2,661
658% 2,894 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 249
4K Mixed 97.5
344% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,342
DQ Write 1,105
DQ Mixed 1,242
925% 1,230 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 411%
Great: 589%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 442 442 442 442 447 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 424
Mixed 403
SusWrite 443
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 25.4
116% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 39.6
88% 177 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 99%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
293GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 190 189 189 189 189 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62% Good
Read 326
Write 348
Mixed 254
SusWrite 189
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 33.1
112% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.4
DQ Write 81.7
DQ Mixed 36.8
34% 49.6 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 62%
Great: 117%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
542GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 189 189 189 190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 322
Write 350
Mixed 159
SusWrite 189
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 33.1
108% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 30.4
DQ Write 92.6
DQ Mixed 39.1
36% 54 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 117%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 472 472 472 472 473 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 458
Mixed 445
SusWrite 472
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 50.3
164% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 342
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 480GB
282GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 369 337 50 68 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 396
Write 361
Mixed 343
SusWrite 219
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 19.4
71% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 48.9
60% 105 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMN32GX4M2Z3600C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 37.9
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 31.4
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 108%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 3,673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback