MSI MS-7513

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardMSI MS-7513  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080724
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 19 '22 at 05:11
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 45
2-Core 87.1
39% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 90.3
8-Core 92.3
12% 91.3 Pts
64-Core 75.8
5% 75.8 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
MSI(1462 3870) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47% Average
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 76.3
Parallax 48.5
48% 61.3 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 53.8
Splatting 47.9
45% 55.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IR-SSDPR-S25A-240 240GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 148 189 107 96 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.7% Average
Read 215
Write 129
Mixed 146
SusWrite 122
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 23.5
88% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 50.3
DQ Mixed 28.4
24% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
255GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 66 74 64 62 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 69
Write 69.2
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 64.2
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 69%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
362GB free
Firmware: CT100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 62 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 53.9
Write 65.8
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 61.3
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
330GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 66 74 64 62 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 134
Write 147
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 64.3
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 109%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
23GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 32.8
Mixed 28.8
34% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.4
83% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4
13% 4.7 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.2
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7513 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-7513

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback