Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	14.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

24 months ago, 24 months ago.

System	HP hp workstation xw6200 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 08B8h
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8.00049 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060905
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 18 '22 at 22:53
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz 38 User benchmarks, average bench 33% XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Memory 53.2 1-Core 31.7 2-Core 55.8 31% 46.9 Pts	4-Core 71.6 8-Core 70.9 10% 71.2 Pts	64-Core 72.5 4% 72.5 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 427.11 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Lighting 15 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 19.4 12% 17.6 fps	MRender 21.9 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 15.5 15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SSD 360GB 360GB 1,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200828 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 47 42 37 43 43 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.9% Very poor	Read 82.3 Write 7 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 40.7 8% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 5.5 31% 8.57 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 84%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 125GB free Firmware: CR100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 40 34 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 49.8 Write 68.5 Mixed 30 SusWrite 41.2 35% 47.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 819 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 29GB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 64 55 65 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 56.5 Write 65.8 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 65.3 72% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 40GB 7,939 User benchmarks, average bench 22% null MHz 4096, 4096, 33280 MB Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz1stBench 30%, 29 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz1stBench 31%, 48 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz1stBench 33%, 38 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16