Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170626
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 18 '22 at 17:26
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	57%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 67.1 2-Core 131 57% 92.9 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 332 35% 282 Pts	64-Core 674 42% 674 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Asus(1043 8850) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	127% Outstanding	Lighting 176 Reflection 221 Parallax 166 143% 188 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 132 Splatting 114 115% 144 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 54 57 65 36 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 269 Write 316 Mixed 282 SusWrite 67 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 56.1 4K Mixed 22.7 91% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 158 147% 226 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 100%
Hyperx Fury 3D 480GB 1,966 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 124GB free Firmware: S3701101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 212 230 232 230 122 MB/s Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.1% Good	Read 258 Write 240 Mixed 223 SusWrite 194 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 19.2 99% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 70.2 87% 154 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Dimm2_Manufacturer D3-60NM104SV- Dimm6_Manufacturer D3-60NM104SV- 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.5% Above average	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 20.9 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.3 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	11x
Xeon E5-2620 v2IntelBench 60%, 2,742 samples	4x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	6x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	4x

SSD
ELITE 512GBZeplinBench 64%, 15 samples	3x
Agility 3 240GBOCZ $199Bench 52%, 10,165 samples	2x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $30Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3 2x8GBTeamBench 51%, 28 samples	3x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 4x4GBCorsairBench 76%, 42 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16