Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMonster MARKUT M7 V5.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER MARKUT M7 V5.1
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '22 at 12:38
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 68.7
1-Core 169
2-Core 332
99% 190 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 920
91% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,383
86% 1,383 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 1305) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
7.46% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 130
Parallax 12.2
8% 50.7 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 0.2
7% 9.23 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.46%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
765GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1616 1634 1713 1717 1741 1735 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 1,193
Write 1,675
Mixed 1169
SusWrite 1,693
325% 1,433 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 79.1
292% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 702
DQ Write 772
DQ Mixed 868
617% 780 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 274%
Great: 299%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
3GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 246
Write 94.5
Mixed 68.6
142% 136 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 7.6
672% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 11.8
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 8.4
646% 9.83 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M8FB 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 29.5
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 19.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MARKUT M7 V5.1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback