HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory20.7 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 20:26
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User PSE-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3520-$230
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 85
1-Core 67
2-Core 140
59% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 343
39% 304 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 04C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.1% Average
Lighting 54.7
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 74.4
45% 62.3 fps
MRender 58.9
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 42.4
43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31480GNTD 480GB
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 227 222 228 227 118 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57% Above average
Read 211
Write 65.8
Mixed 194
SusWrite 198
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 26.7
92% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 159
126% 174 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57%
Great: 98%
WD WD7500KPVT-65HT5T0 750GB
698GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 74 75 74 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 63.9
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 73.1
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 42%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
313GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 157 152 164 162 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 141
Write 150
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 158
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 ID:01 98 ID:01 98 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 15.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback