Asus N43SM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N43SM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N43SM
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120206
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 19:36
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 84.3
49% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 158
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Asus(1043 2110) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 1.6
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X04c12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 75 61 44 61 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 363
Write 171
Mixed 190
SusWrite 71.8
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 5.9
32% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 51.5
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 191
119% 128 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 13
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N43SM Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N43SM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback