Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom E3950 176 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Memory 45.2 1-Core 37.2 2-Core 74.5 32% 52.3 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 144 20% 145 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	1.95% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 2.8 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.95% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Maximus 128G 128GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0927A SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 152 153 160 157 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 344 Write 153 Mixed 164 SusWrite 152 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 10.4 54% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 68.1 75% 126 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 68%
SanDisk Cruzer Micro 4GB 483 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 5151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 5.6 5.7 5.9 5.7 5.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	6.52% Terrible	Read 25.3 Write 5.2 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 5.3 11% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.52% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde D008G3S16H-AC 1x8GB 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.5% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	2x
Atom E3950IntelBench 28%, 176 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	2x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	1x

SSD
128G 128GBMaximusBench 50%, 5 samples	1x
SSD 128GBBiwinBench 57%, 1,868 samples	1x
Portable SSD T5 500GBSamsungBench 75%, 14,526 samples	1x

RAM
SP008GLSTU160N02 1x8GBUndeBench 24%, 6 samples	1x
D008G3S16H-AC 1x8GBUndeBench 25%, 1 sample	1x
CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GBUndeBench 24%, 45 samples	1x