Positivo A1600R / A1700R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPositivo A1600R / A1700R  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo A1600R / A1700R
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190124
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 09:25
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User RWA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6560U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 140
60% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 97.4
26% 167 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Device(1297 2058) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.69% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 4.7
3% 3.4 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 2.69%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
746GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 23 83 92 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 46.5
Write 15.9
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 50.5
24% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
69% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
TI9D3S05H41160 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A1600R / A1700R Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo A1600R / A1700R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback