Machinist X79 Z9-D7

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Machinist X79 Z9-D7 (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210310
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 16 '22 at 18:41
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 3,274 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 74.5 1-Core 72.9 2-Core 152 59% 99.9 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 452 47% 377 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 2761) 3GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.3.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	30.6% Below average	Lighting 40.7 Reflection 34.7 Parallax 53 33% 42.8 fps	MRender 30.6 Gravity 41.8 Splatting 23.9 26% 32.1 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac NVME SSD 256GB 1,034 User benchmarks, average bench 178% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0225A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1163 1160 316 132 134 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 1,453 Write 1,163 Mixed 993 SusWrite 504 229% 1,028 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 23.4 120% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 485 DQ Write 359 DQ Mixed 438 323% 427 MB/s
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 241%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 368GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 198 194 198 197 198 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 180 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 197 117% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 113%
USB FLASH DRIVE 4GB 922 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID b113 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6.4 7 6.8 6.9 6.9 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	4.21% Terrible	Read 13.1 Write 1.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 6.6 7% 6.43 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.21% Great: 8%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 15GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 2.4 6.2 4.5 6.1 6.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 3.2 Write 3 Mixed 2 SusWrite 5.1 5% 3.32 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 33%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 12 14 12 13 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 31.5 Write 14.5 Mixed 20.4 SusWrite 12.9 24% 19.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 4.6 380% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSZF51272PY 36JSZF51272PZ 36JSZF51272PZ 36JSZF51272PZ 16GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.1% Average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 10.5 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 91.4 44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Z9-D7 Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Machinist X79 Z9-D7

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	27x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	12x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	8x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
RX 580-2048SPAMDBench 41%, 38,816 samples	5x

SSD
NE-128 128GBBench 119%, 3,172 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
128GB 128GBXraydiskBench 63%, 994 samples	4x

RAM
36KSF1G72PZ-1 4x8GBMicronBench 79%, 110 samples	8x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	4x
M393B5170FH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 676 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $198

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16