Acer Predator PH315-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive362% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH315-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL QX60_TLS
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211207
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 16 '22 at 16:26
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 55.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 230
71% 135 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 540
58% 463 Pts
64-Core 820
51% 820 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9565
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 52.7
Parallax 6.7
6% 22.1 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 1
5% 6.93 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
902GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2251 2683 2991 2769 3245 3338 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,335
Write 3,417
Mixed 1,797
SusWrite 2,880
590% 2,607 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 75.7
212% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 667
DQ Write 454
DQ Mixed 556
416% 559 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 362%
Great: 540%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 15.9
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 12.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-54 Builds (Compare 3,730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback