Toshiba SATELLITE C850-19D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C850-19D  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PLCSF8
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130717
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '22 at 15:46
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B830
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 67.1
38% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 66.6
8-Core 69.5
9% 68.1 Pts
64-Core 67.2
4% 67.2 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB30) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2.3
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$44
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 314 351 345 333 340 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 350
Write 262
Mixed 268
SusWrite 338
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 31.7
101% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 150
112% 149 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 10
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMO1592
Typical SATELLITE C850-19D Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C850-19D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback