PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 304Bh |
Memory | 13.9 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110714 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 16 '22 at 10:48 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
70%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K5000
Nvidia(10DE 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 412.16
|
21.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X413
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 224 199 199 200 200 MB/s
|
52.3%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
50GB free
Firmware: 10.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 40 40 41 41 40 MB/s
|
23%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 199x |
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 161x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 100x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 82x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 53x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 41x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 34x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 18x |
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $98 |