Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IH_FX706IH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IH_FX706IH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA706IH
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 21:48
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 103
2-Core 205
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 636
64% 517 Pts
64-Core 822
51% 822 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16CF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.06
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 53.6
Parallax 20.3
12% 29.7 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 16.9
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 961 954 1018 1059 896 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,678
Write 1101
Mixed 1,011
SusWrite 826
257% 1,154 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 83.4
289% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 613
DQ Write 822
DQ Mixed 264
326% 566 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 239%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IH_FX706IH Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IH_FX706IH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback