AMD A88K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive17.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAMD A88K  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD A88K
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181109
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 18:51
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 59.9
2-Core 108
51% 80.9 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 145
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 1313) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.45.40.14
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 9.8
6% 8.03 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 7
Splatting 7.8
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.78%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 168 178 173 191 194 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.8% Very poor
Read 43
Write 2.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 166
12% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.3
22% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 90%
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50
59GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 67 69 71 71 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 58.5
Write 29.6
Mixed 42.6
SusWrite 69.9
37% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 15.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 11.2
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88K Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: AMD A88K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback