Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 13:55
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 78.1
1-Core 216
2-Core 427
123% 240 Pts
4-Core 848
8-Core 1,607
146% 1,227 Pts
64-Core 2,990
185% 2,990 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 1TB
632GB free
Firmware: T0430A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 424 423 423 410 431 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 393
Mixed 388
SusWrite 425
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 27
128% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 50.2
87% 166 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 105%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
876GB free
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2806 2788 2830 2753 1764 1620 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
477% Outstanding
Read 2,854
Write 2,579
Mixed 2,973
SusWrite 2,427
610% 2,708 MB/s
4K Read 80.8
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 119
402% 146 MB/s
DQ Read 2,270
DQ Write 1,775
DQ Mixed 1,999
1,502% 2,015 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 477%
Great: 488%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1525 1521 1493 1497 941 838 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 1508
Write 1398
Mixed 1,139
SusWrite 1,302
301% 1,337 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 242
4K Mixed 84.8
313% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 745
DQ Write 959
DQ Mixed 351
404% 685 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 274%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U5200C3816G-B 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
145% Outstanding
MC Read 55.4
MC Write 56.8
MC Mixed 54.4
159% 55.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 51.1
SC Mixed 29.7
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 145%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 5,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,029
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback