Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive437% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 12:59
Run Duration366 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$162
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 181
2-Core 340
110% 203 Pts
4-Core 687
8-Core 1043
107% 865 Pts
64-Core 1,244
77% 1,244 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 109%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 38.5
30% 38.7 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 27
27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$102
791GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3306 3335 3346 2227 1632 1614 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
437% Outstanding
Read 2,579
Write 2,934
Mixed 2,748
SusWrite 2,576
612% 2,709 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 235
4K Mixed 90.5
347% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,818
DQ Write 1,353
DQ Mixed 1,519
1,154% 1,563 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 437%
Great: 488%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
307GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2324 796 796 795 798 809 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
346% Outstanding
Read 2628
Write 2,328
Mixed 1,965
SusWrite 1,053
446% 1,993 MB/s
4K Read 70.2
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 91.9
329% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,881
DQ Write 1,520
DQ Mixed 1,646
1,247% 1,682 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 346%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
460GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 481 482 482 481 479 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 475
Mixed 402
SusWrite 481
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 54.5
172% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
472GB free
Firmware: 1AA01104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 62.7
Write 90.5
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 76.4
53% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 37.3
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 34.7
103% 36 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 32: 5R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
32% 31% 26 208 155 60 27" 2560 1440 HPN36CE HP Z27q G3
History: Score 26: 3R 2G 5B | Score 32: 5R 2G 1B
Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 2,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $514
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback