Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180319
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 14 '22 at 21:52
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$144
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 226
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 544
63% 478 Pts
64-Core 628
42% 628 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$230
Asus(1043 86CE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Lighting 94.1
Reflection 90.6
Parallax 80.4
76% 88.4 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 81.7
Splatting 72.9
64% 74 fps
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 73%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 364 6.3 6.7 6.8 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 426
Write 110
Mixed 27
SusWrite 144
38% 177 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 14.1
67% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 31.5
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 18.2
15% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
242GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 124 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 164
Write 161
Mixed 111
SusWrite 124
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 110%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 95 95 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 92
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 94.1
119% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.8
208% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905702-136.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 24.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 20.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $535
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $350Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback