ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP p6-2133la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP p6-2133la (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn 2ABF
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '17 at 04:44
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$71 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 159 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 222 30% 220 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.72% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 0.34 1% 0.89 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.27 Splatting 1 1% 1.09 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.72% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 750GB-$55 4,103 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 667GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 125923185 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3623 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 8607797426 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 5110 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2395 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 62 62 38 (BC) Unknown 100 95 158 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 55 488308765 (C2) HDA temperature 29 45 34359738397 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 36 28 125923185 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -45621142607708 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2430476093 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3864669848	51.4% Above average	Read 102 Write 77.7 Mixed 85.3 66% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 0.86 4K Mixed 0.34 82% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 586GB free Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 85 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 100 98 (03) Spinup time 119 100 21495939385 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2660 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 100 31 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9106 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2278 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 96 96 327679 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 131072 (BC) Unknown 100 91 4401268065 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 54 505348127 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2661 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2661 (C2) HDA temperature 193 133 197569216543 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	61.9% Good	Read 109 Write 107 Mixed 101 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.37 96% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 76%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 58.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 154 152 3258 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1903 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 22374 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1894 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 432 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2014 (C2) HDA temperature 110 91 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.8% Below average	Read 62.9 Write 61.7 Mixed 61.2 47% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.24 74% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback