Acer Aspire E5-422

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-422  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer SANJI_CZL
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '22 at 18:39
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
24% Poor
Memory 30.3
1-Core 28.3
2-Core 60.2
23% 39.6 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 103
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
Acer(1025 095A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.5
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.8
1% 2 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EYOTA-256GB 256GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 244 316 336 127 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 354
Write 320
Mixed 318
SusWrite 230
69% 305 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 24.7
77% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 71.5
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 128
94% 120 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-155.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.1
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.2
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 253
16% 253 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-422 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-422

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback