| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3128-A1 |
| Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130920 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 14 '22 at 13:31 |
| Run Duration | 190 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
74.9%
Very good
|
72% 125 Pts
|
51% 403 Pts
|
29% 465 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
|
5.97%
Terrible
|
6% 7.67 fps
|
6% 8.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD VelociRaptor 2.5" 500GB-$122
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 134 156 173 175 181 MB/s
|
97.9%
Outstanding
|
114% 156 MB/s
|
313% 2.47 MB/s
| |
|
LSI Logical Volume 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 265 267 273 270 276 MB/s
|
||||
|
LSI Logical Volume 299GB
277GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
|
74.5%
Very good
|
76% 104 MB/s
|
199% 1.17 MB/s
| |
|
WD Game Drive 5TB
2GB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5 5.3 5.1 5.2 5.2 MB/s
|
1.88%
Terrible
|
7% 4.72 MB/s
|
7% 0.1 MB/s
| |
|
Corsair Voyager SliderX1 64GB
13GB free, PID 1a15
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 13 13 14 14 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
20% 17.3 MB/s
|
92% 2.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
88.8%
Excellent
|
98% 34.5 GB/s
|
41% 14.4 GB/s
|
57% 70.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 109 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 71x |
| Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 7x |
| Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 15x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 11x |
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |