ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	X79
Motherboard	Intel X79
Memory	13 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '22 at 11:08
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 204 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 620 60% 494 Pts	64-Core 765 47% 765 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8422) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Lighting 22.2 Reflection 25.4 Parallax 31.1 18% 26.2 fps	MRender 32.6 Gravity 27.3 Splatting 24.2 22% 28 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SKC2500M8250G 250GB 1,594 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: S7780101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 529 350 362 363 364 364 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	165% Outstanding	Read 1,609 Write 1222 Mixed 1,170 SusWrite 389 245% 1,097 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 50.3 172% 64 MB/s	DQ Read 638 DQ Write 420 DQ Mixed 470 367% 510 MB/s
Poor: 121% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 276%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 129GB free Firmware: HPH4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 132 133 133 133 133 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Read 179 Write 133 Mixed 78.5 SusWrite 132 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 112%
ST1000DM 003-1SB102 1TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 124GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 34.9 Write 17.3 Mixed 28.6 SusWrite 37 39% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 4,425 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47.7% Average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 12.3 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback