Samsung R780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive9.65% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSamsung R780  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R780
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100705
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMay 14 '22 at 04:34
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 450
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
45.2% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 107
48% 79 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 146
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Sanyo(144D C06A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.56% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.3
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.9
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.56%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 045C8820
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 40 6.5 70 17 0.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.65% Terrible
Read 207
Write 66.3
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 22.5
21% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 9.65%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.6
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R780 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback