Medion Akoya P4130 D MD8302/2470

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics70.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion Akoya P4130 D MD8302/2470  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION D3F3-EM2
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 22:15
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8750 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 43
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 104
36% 62.8 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 165
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.4% Very good
Lighting 88.1
Reflection 86.8
Parallax 78.2
72% 84.4 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 78.5
Splatting 70.1
68% 85 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
R7SL240G 240GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0303A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 110 81 76 71 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 414
Write 322
Mixed 126
SusWrite 107
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 29.5
83% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 71.5
98% 180 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 142 143 143 144 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 132
Write 99.8
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 141
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CC88D7N-DI 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 13.6
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.7
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Akoya P4130 D MD8302/2470 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Akoya P4130 D MD8302/2470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback