Hp-pavilion AZ215AV-ABA s5380t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHp-pavilion AZ215AV-ABA s5380t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Eureka3
Memory1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091113
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 21:38
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$131
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 39
2-Core 79.3
41% 63 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 135
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
MSI(1462 2131) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 207 191 189 122 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.8% Below average
Read 176
Write 195
Mixed 148
SusWrite 164
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 12.7
47% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 26.1
52% 104 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HDS721064CLA332 640GB
282GB free
Firmware: JPGOA3BF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 91.5
Write 99.4
Mixed 54
SusWrite 69.2
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.6% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AZ215AV-ABA s5380t Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion AZ215AV-ABA s5380t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback