Sony SVS13127PGB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony SVS13127PGB  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120918
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 13:24
Run Duration414 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.3% Poor
Memory 32.9
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 37.1
21% 31.6 Pts
4-Core 55.4
8-Core 65.4
8% 60.4 Pts
64-Core 53.1
3% 53.1 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sony(104D 909A) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 0.5
1% 2.13 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 240GB 240GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMKA.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2 1.7 1.4 1 1.7 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.8% Poor
Read 281
Write 4
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 1.8
16% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.3
39% 8.73 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 95%
WD Elements 25A2 1.5TB
163GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1.6 1.3 1.3 1.6 2.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 353
Write 3.2
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 1.7
64% 92 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
146% 8.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 65%
Lenovo USB Hard Drive 1TB
164GB free, PID 4533
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.7 1.1 0.9 1.9 3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 398
Write 4.2
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 1.5
72% 103 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
22.1% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.6
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.7
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 238
17% 238 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SVS13127PGB Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Sony SVS13127PGB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback