HP 630 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 630 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3674
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 23:24
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 114
51% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 144
21% 153 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 240GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 52 55 54 66 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.4% Below average
Read 211
Write 187
Mixed 199
SusWrite 59.5
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 15.1
52% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 45.8
72% 138 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV Micron 16JTF51264JHZ1G6M2 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.1% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.4
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 630 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 630 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback