Sony VPCF136FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSony VPCF136FX  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory1.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100903
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 19:41
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 89
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 107
55% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 202
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M
Sony(104D 907A) 1GB
CLim: 560 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.62% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 5
Parallax 1
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 2.6
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.62%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 61 60 55 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 30.5
Write 41.2
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 55.6
28% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 9.4
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCF136FX Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCF136FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $218
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback