Asus F1A75-I DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-I DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140530
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 18:47
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 46.5
2-Core 94.5
40% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 189
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 5.2
4% 5 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 125 107 123 115 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 342
Write 174
Mixed 209
SusWrite 119
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 12.8
71% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 95.8
DQ Mixed 15.6
25% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.4% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.6
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-I DELUXE Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-I DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback