Medion E14411

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMedion E14411  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION SF40CM
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 18:13
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 20.1
50% 66.3 Pts
4-Core 28.9
8-Core 28.4
4% 28.6 Pts
64-Core 16.2
1% 16.2 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E39 A03B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.6 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison SM8256GPKTCB4TECS-S11L4 256GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 85 79 88 292 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 320
Write 87.7
Mixed 253
SusWrite 157
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 10.7
62% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 184
158% 231 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMSO480E85-2666E 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.7
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E14411 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E14411

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback