HP p6732f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP p6732f  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2A92
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 15:50
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 445-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 45.3
2-Core 89
44% 68.8 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 134
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3611) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 0.6
1% 1.73 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 106 106 103 103 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 106
Write 110
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 96.5
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST380013AS 79GB
8GB free
Firmware: 3.18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 41 37 38 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.3% Poor
Read 33.4
Write 33.9
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 37.3
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.53 MB/s
Seagate ST3500418AS 500GB
92GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 87 85 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 95.8
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 86.4
61% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.6% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 12.1
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 9
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6732f Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6732f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback