Samsung R423D/R523D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSamsung R423D/R523D  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R423D/R523D
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110506
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 09:47
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II P960
Socket ASB2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Memory 35.8
1-Core 26.9
2-Core 53.4
24% 38.7 Pts
4-Core 98.2
8-Core 101
13% 99.6 Pts
64-Core 99.4
6% 99.4 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4290 (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.1)
Sanyo(144D C584) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.2
0% 0.53 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 1.8
2% 2.77 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 37 51 49 32 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 46.7
Write 34.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 38.5
26% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 47%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
5GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 7.1 5.9 8.1 8.4 8.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Read 11
Write 2.3
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 7.3
7% 6.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CF8 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R423D/R523D Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Samsung R423D/R523D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback