Asus N550JV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N550JV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N550JV
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín, 4096x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131119
Uptime14.4 Days
Run DateMay 11 '22 at 23:05
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 176
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 436
49% 384 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 11CD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 5.9
3% 6.07 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 92 87 94 93 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 415
Write 400
Mixed 297
SusWrite 119
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 39.4
142% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 168
178% 295 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
817GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 99 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 87.3
Write 85.7
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 99.2
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-072.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.5
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 20.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N550JV Builds (Compare 605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N550JV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback