Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W5580 19 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 73.5 2-Core 149 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 349 38% 299 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 56,417 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.1% Above average	Lighting 67.9 Reflection 71.9 Parallax 66.1 55% 68.6 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 68.3 Splatting 65.7 55% 67 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC-WRSN 1TB 1,183 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 329GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 123 138 128 128 132 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 365 Write 238 Mixed 225 SusWrite 125 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 27.6 85% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 206 159% 217 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 107%
WD WD4003FRYZ-01F0DB0 4TB 735 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 2.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 135 150 144 153 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 200 Mixed 107 SusWrite 136 118% 161 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 1.8 402% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 137%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 20 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 13.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 63%

Destroyer

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $110Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	4x
SM841N 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 83%, 2,088 samples	3x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $699