TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba Satellite M840

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite M840  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121227
Uptime52.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '22 at 20:03
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User BHR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 79
2-Core 155
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 380
38% 308 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 62.7%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M
Toshiba(1179 FB81) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 5.3
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5.2
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 4.85%
 Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 210 154 127 0.1 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 316
Write 170
Mixed 263
SusWrite 128
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 30.2
103% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 121
154% 276 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 68.2%
 Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston 9905428-093.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
37.6% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 37.6%
 Great: 49%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Satellite M840 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite M840

CPU
Core i7-3612QMIntelBench 60%, 11,760 samples11x
Core i5-3210MIntel  $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples9x
Core i5-3230MIntel  $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples8x
GPU
Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples28x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples3x
Radeon HD 7670MAMDBench 4%, 910 samples2x
SSD
240G 240GBSSDBench 58%, 198 samples3x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples2x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples2x
RAM
M471B5773DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 6GBSamsungBench 42%, 1,547 samples3x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 51%, 283 samples2x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback