Medionpc MS-7728

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedionpc MS-7728  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDIONPC MS-7728
Memory6.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '17 at 16:06
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 162
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 288
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
MSI(1462 2612) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.75% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 9.19
9% 11 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 14.7
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.75%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4G Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 159
Write 136
Mixed 141
109% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.28
70% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 114%
SAMSUNG HM500JI 500GB
147GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 23.9
Mixed 20.3
30% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.4
50% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
36.6% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7728 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Medionpc MS-7728

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback