bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory320GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 320GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory279.3 GB free of 320 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1174 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20201112
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 11 '22 at 12:11
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7262 8-Core
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 54.8
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 141
50% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 359
44% 336 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 268GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 199
Mixed 84.5
106% 142 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 7.7
1,123% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 86%
Vmware Virtual disk 644GB
26GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 86 57 85 29 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 92%
Vmware Virtual disk 322GB
111GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 90 62 134 109 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 96%
Vmware Virtual disk 1.5TB
103GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 43 84 68 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
96GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 58 124 98 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 200
Write 178
Mixed 119
SusWrite 82.4
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 2.2
458% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20x16GB
20 of 128 slots used
320GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 99.4
150% 52.3 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 5.5
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 121%
Great: 152%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback