Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory36.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '22 at 03:00
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 223
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 685
67% 550 Pts
64-Core 1,127
70% 1,127 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (120 fps cap detected)
96.4% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 115
Parallax 120
98% 118 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 120
Splatting 106
94% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$199
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 40 42 44 44 98 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.4% Poor
Read 42
Write 57.3
Mixed 39
SusWrite 51.5
11% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 13.2
52% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 38.3
DQ Mixed 65.3
64% 107 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 122%
Samsung PM871b 2.5 7mm 512GB
22GB free
Firmware: MVT02D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 232 87 88 80 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 448
Write 365
Mixed 374
SusWrite 164
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 31.5
102% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 235
168% 220 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
5GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,060
Write 868
Mixed 850
206% 926 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 34.2
114% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 286
214% 284 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Amd-raid ST16000NM001G-2K 16TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 185 181 182 176 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 148
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 180
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.7
314% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 101%
Great: 146%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 114 111 111 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 109
Write 64.6
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 112
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.5% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 22.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 20.1
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,072
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback