Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% rPGA988A Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	45.9% Average	Memory 64.4 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 117 50% 83.5 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 161 22% 161 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 0003) 2.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.56% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.9 0% 0.9 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.9 1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.56% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCM-128M3S 2.5" 7mm 128GB 388 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: WQDA SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 194 187 163 196 178 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.6% Average	Read 215 Write 193 Mixed 158 SusWrite 185 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 16 56% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 122 103% 151 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	18x
NVS 2100MNvidiaBench 1%, 481 samples	9x

SSD
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	2x
G5 BICS4 1TBSandiskBench 94%, 7,638 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $108

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16