MSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 207%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C59
MotherboardMSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59)  (all builds)
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210929
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '22 at 03:13
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3960X-$1,350
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 294
85% 161 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 877
89% 722 Pts
64-Core 4,398
272% 4,398 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
EVGA(3842 4877) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 5038 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 277
Parallax 351
184% 284 fps
MRender 329
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 194
142% 175 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 156%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
989GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 190 447 591 622 615 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 2,150
Mixed 746
SusWrite 470
220% 962 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 38.4
118% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 509
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 483
359% 476 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 106%
Great: 494%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 2TB
493GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.9% Poor
Read 42.1
Write 38.2
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 38.3
9% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 15
50% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 30.7
DQ Mixed 31.2
23% 29 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 88%
Amd-raid Array 3 255GB
63GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 174 174 174 173 210 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 252
Write 595
Mixed 188
SusWrite 199
70% 308 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 18.8
69% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 172
122% 157 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 163%
Amd-raid Array 1 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 155 1256 1280 1350 1332 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4800 C20 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.9% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 20.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 28.7
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59) Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 279%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $2,708
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback