Positivo POS-EINM70CS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemPositivo POS-EINM70CS  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-EINM70CS
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20130415
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 09 '22 at 23:55
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 56.4
38% 53.1 Pts
4-Core 54.9
8-Core 57.6
8% 56.2 Pts
64-Core 56.7
4% 56.7 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
MSI(1462 1163) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 340.52
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 0.9
0% 1.27 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.6
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 86 101 28 34 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.6% Poor
Read 230
Write 105
Mixed 129
SusWrite 74.9
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 7.2
27% 8.4 MB/s
DQ Read 10.3
DQ Write 12.3
DQ Mixed 8.7
7% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 90%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
847GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 89 89 86 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 72.3
Write 44.2
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 89.3
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-EINM70CS Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-EINM70CS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback