Lenovo 20SFS03L00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 68% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20SFS03L00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20SFS03L00
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '22 at 22:59
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 68%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m3-8100Y
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 63.5
45% 67.6 Pts
4-Core 66
8-Core 53.4
8% 59.7 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Legend(17AA 507B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.9
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.9
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_ CT275MX300SS 275GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 228 243 249 150 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 249
Write 302
Mixed 270
SusWrite 210
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 14
48% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 146
109% 145 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 69%
Kbg40zmt128g TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GB
42GB free
Firmware: 0106AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 118 346 333 259 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 1,032
Write 660
Mixed 695
SusWrite 259
147% 662 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 42.5
149% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 37.8
DQ Mixed 82.9
68% 100 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 108%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304ED-EGCG 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 10.7
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20SFS03L00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20SFS03L00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback