Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS AC

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS AC (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200922
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	May 09 '22 at 19:52
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$97 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Memory 90.7 1-Core 83.2 2-Core 248 77% 141 Pts	4-Core 459 8-Core 771 75% 615 Pts	64-Core 987 61% 987 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$255 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% MSI(1462 397B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.59 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 130 Reflection 121 Parallax 127 106% 126 fps	MRender 145 Gravity 106 Splatting 92.2 91% 114 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 556GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 79 83 81 82 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 400 Write 81.3 Mixed 120 SusWrite 80.9 37% 171 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 91.1 4K Mixed 24.3 111% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 90.4 DQ Mixed 109 88% 128 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 121%
Neo Forza NFS011SA356-6007000 256GB 1,490 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 62GB free Firmware: T1125A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 424 426 427 120 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 419 Write 436 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 318 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 15.1 80% 179 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 192 193 193 194 187 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 130 Mixed 86.8 SusWrite 190 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 190 191 191 191 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 207 Write 106 Mixed 81.4 SusWrite 190 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	82% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 23 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 33.3 SC Mixed 23.9 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS AC Builds (Compare 1,391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 95%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 93%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS AC

CPU
Core i7-10700FIntel $180Bench 93%, 44,448 samples	832x
Core i5-10400FIntel $97Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	386x
Core i3-10105FIntelBench 82%, 14,843 samples	47x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	421x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	351x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $499Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	94x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	259x
M370 1TBMSIBench 210%, 3,658 samples	185x
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $75Bench 251%, 14,932 samples	113x

RAM
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 40,300 samples	293x
D4U0830160B 2x8GBUnknownBench 71%, 1,031 samples	169x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	147x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $509

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS AC

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS AC

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)