HP 500-417ng

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 500-417ng  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '22 at 13:11
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 176
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 340
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 52.7
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 52.4
43% 54.3 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 49.5
Splatting 46.4
43% 53 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
903GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 347 369 370 369 366 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 369
Write 353
Mixed 244
SusWrite 347
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 27.5
124% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 199
190% 298 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 118%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107
2.5TB free
Firmware: ACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 188 190 191 189 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 177
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 189
105% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-417ng Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP 500-417ng

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback