Alienware 17 R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAlienware 17 R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware 17 R4
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '17 at 03:04
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 133
2-Core 250
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 703
71% 575 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 07C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 138
Parallax 114
96% 123 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 116
Splatting 102
88% 108 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$65
153GB free
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 479
Write 335
Mixed 335
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 24.6
97% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 55.1
96% 189 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 104%
Nvme THNSN51T02DUK NV 1TB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KDA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,636
Write 943
Mixed 1,227
281% 1,268 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 37.9
190% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 487
DQ Write 447
DQ Mixed 212
229% 382 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 200%
Great: 163%
Transcend TS512GMTS400 512GB
72GB free
Firmware: O1225H1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 437
Mixed 470
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 39.2
143% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 34.3
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 57.5
71% 118 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 109%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
246GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3W0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 101
Mixed 112
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.19
66% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 25.9
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 24.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 17 R4 Builds (Compare 2,698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Alienware 17 R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback