Asus X55C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X55C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X55C
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130109
Uptime19 Days
Run DateMay 08 '22 at 14:45
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2328M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 95
51% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 143
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 14C7) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.77 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 54.5
Write 301
Mixed 103
35% 153 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 23.1
82% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 9.3
33% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
18GB free
Firmware: GG2OA6C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 57 56 53 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 94.7
Write 94.2
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 52.9
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X55C Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X55C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback