Lenovo 43514Q9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 43514Q9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140521
Uptime12 Days
Run DateMay 08 '22 at 08:09
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 96.1
44% 69.6 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 188
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.96
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 10.7
7% 9.9 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 9.6
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 89 92 101 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 120
Write 111
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 95.3
70% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 74%
WD 3200AAJ External 320GB
174GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 23.1
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 25.5
34% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-085.A 9965525-085.A Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.3% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 23.9
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 43514Q9 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 43514Q9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback