HP CQ2815EA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP CQ2815EA  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AE2
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120515
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 08 '22 at 00:38
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G540T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 76.8
43% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 88.9
8-Core 93.6
12% 91.2 Pts
64-Core 85.8
5% 85.8 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2AE2) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.51% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.7
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.51%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 75 41 60 104 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 83.8
71% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
2TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 23 22 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 26.4
Write 19.8
Mixed 21
SusWrite 22.1
30% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.1
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CQ2815EA Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP CQ2815EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback