Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime12 Days
Run DateMay 07 '22 at 23:23
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 260
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 788
77% 630 Pts
64-Core 991
61% 991 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 181
Parallax 141
114% 154 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 138
Splatting 110
114% 144 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 170 168 172 170 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 470
Write 191
Mixed 157
SusWrite 169
54% 247 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 23.2
115% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 57.3
98% 197 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 85%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
268GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1503 1276 1277 1267 1116 1101 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,373
Write 2,283
Mixed 1654
SusWrite 1,257
424% 1,892 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 81.9
273% 96.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1254
DQ Write 943
DQ Mixed 1,076
810% 1,091 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 305%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
141GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 480 480 475 445 420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 478
Mixed 396
SusWrite 461
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 57.7
194% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 360
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
729GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 171 171 170 169 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 178
Mixed 103
SusWrite 171
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.3
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 24.1
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II Builds (Compare 644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $540
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback